Download discussion questions: Galatians 1:1-9
Seven Questions – Inductively From Galatians
Calvary Institute – Fall 2018 Index
This week in Calvary Institute, our discussion started at the beginning of Paul’s letter to the Galatians. Last week we looked ahead (like reading the end of a novel first) to see where the apostle was headed. One of the goals over the next weeks will be to see how the letter leads to his exhortations to “walk by the Spirit” (Galatians 5:25) and to “bear one another’s burdens” (Galatians 6:2).
The Setting
One of the first questions in our discussion (after spending about ten minutes looking at the passage individually) was, “What or who were the Galatians?” That’s always a good place to start. Knowing who the original audience was helps understand what the letter meant to them.
It is generally agreed that Galatia was a region in present-day Turkey, as shown on any number of maps.[1] The letter is usually dated around AD 48[2] making it most likely the earliest of the New Testament writings. Here we have a very early explanation of the gospel, as well as the controversies that were already facing the church only a few years into its existence.
Galatians, whatever its date, is a most important document of primitive Christianity, but if it is the earliest extant Christian document, its importance is enhanced.[3]
One member of our group pointed out the plural “churches” in verse 2. Apparently the problem that prompted the letter was not isolated but was spread through several cities in the region.
Authority
As we discussed the passage, someone pointed out that verses 1-5 “set the stage” and answer the question, “Why should we (or the Galatians) read this letter?” Apparently Paul had visited the churches before (Galatians 4:13), but he still reminds them of his credentials. He is very emphatic about his authority as an apostle (literally, “one who is sent on a mission”, v. 1). He goes out of his way to make it clear that the authority is not derived from other people’s opinions, but his message is of divine origin, backed up by the central miracle of the faith, the resurrection (v. 1).
The mention of the resurrection seems to stir worship in Paul about what God has done. As one member of our group suggested, verses 3-5 are his “elevator speech” or outline about the gospel:
Grace and peace are available
because of what God the Father has done
through Jesus Christ
who gave Himself
for our sins
to rescue us from the present evil age
all according to the Father’s plan
Verse 5, ascribing eternal glory to God the Father, is a “doxology,” and someone asked what is meant by that term. Doxa (δόξα) is the Greek word for glory, so a doxology is the act of glorifying God. None of Paul’s other letters includes such a doxology in his introduction,[4] perhaps a hint of how different this first letter is from his later writings.
The Tone of the Passage
Our discussion turned to the tone of the passage, with a distinct change of feeling in verse 6. Paul’s qualification and his praise of God begin on a very positive note. However, the serious purpose behind the letter is the news that has stunned Paul. He was “amazed” (NASB, CSB), “astonished” (ESV, NIV), “shocked” (NLT). Our group’s paraphrase: “I can’t believe it!” Participants in our group described the tone of this section (v. 6-9) as “an indictment” or “parental.”
Paul’s strong reaction reflects the seriousness of the situation. The accurate understanding of the gospel is critical. He mentions a different gospel (v. 6b), then corrects himself (v. 7). What the Galatians have turned to is no gospel at all, but a distortion of the message delivered by Paul from God (v. 1). His direct, perhaps even harsh reaction is about the content of the gospel. One person in our group pointed out the contrast with Paul’s reaction to the preaching of the gospel for the wrong motive (Philippians 1:12-18). As long as the genuine gospel was being proclaimed, he was glad even if the “preachers” were only out to stir up more trouble. But the distortion (Galatians 1:7) circulating among the Galatian churches crossed the line of true orthodoxy.
Paul’s Confidence
In verse 8 Paul makes a staggering statement. He is so adamant about the accuracy his preaching (v. 8b) that an announcement from “an angel from heaven” (v. 8a) should not modify the message. He even warns them against the (unlikely) possibility that he might make changes to the authentic gospel they had previously received.
How confident are we in the truth of the gospel? How confident are we in our understanding of the gospel? Could we echo Paul’s exhortation? When we share the gospel with an unbeliever, or when we discuss doctrine with other Christians, how sure are we of what we believe and what we say?
The consequences Paul says (twice) are sobering and maybe even alarming. Communicating a distorted version of the gospel is deserving of God’s curse (v. 8b, 9b). Whether or not he is simply using hyperbole for emphasis, it clearly shows that we must be serious about what we believe and how we communicate our beliefs to others. His rebuke was for people who intentionally distort the message and disturb the listeners. The gravity of the warning should make us cautious about imparting mistaken ideas about God’s truth. And yet, Paul’s bold confidence should give us hope that we can understand and communicate the Christian message accurately.
Spiritual Theology
The framework of theology can be a great help in keeping our message within the boundaries of orthodoxy. Spiritual Theology is intended to provide a practical understanding of general theological concepts (the seven questions) that will help us recognize and maintain those boundaries.
The cover of Christianity Today magazine, October 2015 issue, used a wonderful illustration. The theme of the issue was “How to Define Heresy.” That text was superimposed over a box. Within the boundaries of the box the letters were highlighted, “How to deFINE HEREsy.” The highlighted “FINE HERE” was inside the boundaries, and the background within the boundaries was the text of the Nicene Creed.[5]
Doctrinal views within the framework of the creed are “Fine Here.” Beyond those boundaries we risk the “different gospel” of Paul’s warning. Theological systems are generally much broader than the ancient creeds, but they still offer helpful guidelines for integrating the teaching of Scripture.
Most approaches to theology (Systematic Theology,[6] Historical Theology,[7] Doctrinal Theology,[8] Biblical Theology[9], etc.) usually start with answers or propositional statements that clearly define various doctrinal truths. Spiritual Theology (in our approach) starts with the seven questions.
No matter what approach to theology we use, it must be based on Scripture. The value of theology is the framework it provides. A framework built from the whole of the Bible will help us avoid misinterpreting a particular verse taken out of context (a favorite tactic of “disturbers” in first century Galatia or twenty-first century cults). We need to see Spiritual Theology growing out of our study of Scripture (specifically Galatians). Therefore, part of the inductive study in our group will be considering what answers to the seven questions we find in Galatians. Naturally, not every passage will address every question, but gathering information will help us put together what will grow into Spiritual Theology.
To that end, our group had several suggestions about what we might learn about the seven questions even from the brief passage we considered. These preliminary results are summarized in the article “Seven Questions – Inductively From Galatians.” Hopefully, over the next weeks we will continue to add to that list. Growing in our understanding of the seven questions will help us communicate the genuine gospel that Paul defended.
Soul Care
Understanding Christian truth is one thing. Speaking (and receiving) the truth in love (Ephesians 4:15) is also essential.
What if someone said verse 6 to you? What would go through your mind? How would you respond to the person? Would you be defensive? Feel guilty? Would you withdraw? Would you counterattack in anger?
On the other hand, if you felt another person was drifting (or rushing) into a false gospel, how would you convey that truth? What would motivate you? What emotions would drive you in that conversation?
Soul Care[10] is one way of growing to have “conversations that matter.” Instead of our typical mode of response, we need to be aware of what is happening within ourselves, and we need to give some thought to what may be happening in the other person. We will be discussing (and hopefully practicing) soul care over the next weeks, but a few beginning comments might be helpful.
Think Passion
The first attitude in soul care is to “Think Passion.” What are the passions or desires or distractions with us in a conversation?
The “assignment” from last week was to be aware of what goes through our mind in a conversation. Are we bored? Impatient? Annoyed? Waiting for our turn to speak? As one person in the group suggested, “Are we listening to respond, or are we listening to listen?” (Later, she corrected this to “listening to hear,” but I still like “listen to listen” better.)
Simply recognizing these kinds of inner attitudes and subtle distractions can be a great first step in having a conversation that matters. When I realize that I am half listening because I have such a great thought to share (if the person would ever pause for a breath), then I can turn back to really listening. If the thought is really that great, it will come back to me (or better, if the Holy Spirit wants that shared, He will remind me).
As we continue in Calvary Institute, may God deepen our Bible study. May He increase our theological understanding. And may He enable us to communicate His truth accurately and lovingly to those around us in conversations that matter.
[1] For example, https://verbumetecclesia.org.za/index.php/ve/article/view/422/541
[2] Douglas J. Moo, Galatians, Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Academic, 2013), 18).
[3] F. F. Bruce, The Epistle to the Galatians, The New International Greek Testament Commentary (Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1982), 56.
[4] F. F. Bruce, The Epistle to the Galatians, The New International Greek Testament Commentary (Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1982), 77.
[5] Cover, Christianity Today, October 2015; used by permission.
[6] Systematic Theology is probably the most comprehensive approach. Various categories about God’s character and His work are discussed in an orderly, systematized way.
[7] Historical Theology studies various doctrines of Christianity and their development and refinement through the history of Israel and of the church.
[8] Doctrinal Theology categorizes belief by according to different doctrinal themes and examines those themes in detail.
[9] Biblical Theology develops various doctrines based on particular sections of Scripture or different Biblical writers.
[10] Adapted from Guide to Soul Care, NewWay Ministries, 2006